Read the following passage and answer the questions. The pioneers of the teaching of science imagined that its introductionintoeducation would remove the conventionality, artificiality, and backwardlookingness which were characteristic; of classical studies, but theyweregravely disappointed. So, too, in their time had the humanists thought that
the study of the classical authors in the original would banish at once thedull pedantry and superstition of mediaeval scholasticism. The
professional schoolmaster was a match for both of them, and has almost
managed to make the understanding of chemical reactions as dull andasdogmatic an affair as the reading of Virgil's Aeneid. The chief claimfor
the use of science in education is that it teaches a child something about
the actual universe in which he is living, in making himacquaintedwiththe results of scientific discovery, and at the same time teaches himhowto think logically and inductively by studying scientific method.
A certain limited success has been reached in the first of these aims, but
practically none at all in the second. Those privileged members of thecommunity who have been through a secondary or publicschool
education may be expected to know something about the elementaryphysics and chemistry of a hundred years ago, but they probably knowhardly more than any bright boy can pick up from an interest in wirelessor scientific hobbies out of school hours. As to the learning of scientificmethod, the whole thing is palpably a farce. Actually, for the convenienceof teachers and the requirements of the examination system, it is
necessary that the pupils not only do not learn scientific method but learnprecisely the reverse, that is, to believe exactly what they are told andtoreproduce it when asked, whether it seems nonsense to themor not. The way in which educated people respond to such quackeries as
spiritualism or astrology, not say more dangerous ones such as racial
theories or currency myths, shows that fifty years of education in the
method of science in Britain or Germany has produced no visible effect
whatever. The only way of learning the method of science is the longandbitter way of personal experience, and, until the educational or social
systems are altered to make this possible, the best we can expect is theproduction of a minority of people who are able to acquire some of thetechniques of science and a still smaller minority who are able to use anddevelop them.
23. The author blames all of the following for the failure to impart
scientific method through education system except
A Good teaching
B Examination method
C Lack of Direct experience
D The social and education systems
E Lack of interest on the part of students